GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.

 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile




SHAKIN’ ALL OVER: FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL TURMOIL©Leo Haviland April 1, 2025

The Guess Who sing in “Shakin’ All Over”: 
“That’s when I get the chills all over me
Quivers down my backbone
I got the shakes in my thigh bone
I got the shivers in my knee bone
Shakin’ all over”.

****

CONCLUSION

The United States (and global) economy probably will slow down substantially. The risk of a recession is substantial. Forces warning of American and international economic weakness are widespread. What are some of these factors? 

United States inflation benchmarks such as the Consumer Price Index have receded toward the Federal Reserve’s two percent objective, but they remain far enough above that target to preclude near term easing by the Fed in the absence of substantial economic weakness. The Fed has adopted a cautious strategy regarding further rate cuts. Moreover, this guardian may need to raise rates if inflation increases more than expected. 

The optimistic rhetoric regarding and devoted faith in the strategies of “Make America Great Again” (“MAGA”) and “America First” do not preclude substantial economic (and political) dangers resulting from the implementation of those programs. The essence (broad outlines) of President Trump’s probable tariff plans (which currently appear more extreme than most had expected he would impose), will generate inflation, damage consumer and business confidence, and (at least for the near term) hamper domestic (and worldwide) economic growth. Substantial protectionism does not necessarily create beneficial outcomes. America’s trading partners will retaliate. Everyone remembers that trade (tariff) wars encouraged the Great Depression to begin in 1929. In addition, the tax and immigration policies embraced by Trump and his allies represent noteworthy inflationary risks. 

Also, the long term and arguably even the near term US fiscal situation and its management are dangerous. American deficit spending and debt levels represent ongoing problems. These challenges preceded Trump’s inauguration on 1/20/25, but despite spirited talk of and hunts for fiscal savings, the current Administration’s schemes probably will worsen the nation’s debt situation. Massive fiscal expansionism over an extensive time span arguably at some point can begin to endanger rather than bolster economic growth, in part because the combination of substantial deficit spending and a very large government debt as a percentage of GDP tends to boost interest rates, especially longer term ones. Significant fierce debates regarding spending and the debt ceiling loom. 

America is not a developing/emerging marketplace nation. Yet as in those other countries, mammoth and growing US federal debt, especially in conjunction with fierce ongoing US political conflict and inflationary phenomena (encouraged by massive US tariffs), could produce a further noteworthy yield jump. There is a substantial chance that the UST 10 year’s October 2023 summit will be attacked over the next several months. However, if the American economy threatens to or actually enters a recession, the UST 10 year probably will assault 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent low. 

The essay “As the World Turns: Marketplace Battlefields” (1/1/25) emphasized: “Many times over the past century, significantly increasing United States interest rates have preceded a major peak, or at least a noteworthy top, in key stock marketplace benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S+P 500. The UST 10 year note’s yield increase from 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent interim low, and especially alongside the recent runup stage from 12/6/24’s 4.13pc to 12/26/24’s 4.64pc probably warns of a significant decline in the S+P 500 from 12/6/24’s 6100, especially since the Federal Reserve’s real Broad Dollar Index has rallied in recent months and is now probably “too strong”. The S+P 500 price probably will not exceed its December 2024 high by much, if at all.” 

Note the S+P 500’s 5.4 percent initial dip from 12/6/24’s elevation to 1/13/25’s 5773. The UST 10 year yield nevertheless continued its climb after 12/6/24’s 4.13pc interim low to reach 1/14/25’s 4.81pc. The S+P 500 peaked not long thereafter, on 2/19/25 at 6147. This S+P 500 pinnacle surpassed 12/6/24’s interim high by less than one percent. With 1/14/25’s 4.81 percent high, the UST 10 year note yield traveled above 4/25/24’s important top at 4.74pc and neared 10/23/23’s 5.02pc peak. The S+P 500 collapsed from 2/19/25’s pinnacle to 3/31/25’s 5489, a 10.7pc slump in merely six weeks. The S+P 500’s 3/31/25 low probably will be broken, even if Trump chooses to make his upcoming 4/2/25 Liberation Day tariff regime less burdensome in order to support stock prices. Though bullish optimism about corporate earnings for calendar years 2025 and 2026 persists, and even if the Trump Administration manages to engineer a noteworthy tax cut and reduce government spending to some extent, an eventual bear move in the S+P 500 of around 20 percent or more from February 2025’s peak will be unsurprising. History shows that most US bear stock trends do not end in less than two months. 

A substantial and persistent decline in the S+P 500 would warn of (or confirm) an economic downturn.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Shakin' All Over- Financial and Political Turmoil (4-1-25)

MARKETPLACE RELATIONSHIPS: LIFE DURING WARTIME © Leo Haviland March 7, 2022

In Mario Vargas Llosa’s novel “The War of the End of the World” (Part III, chapter II), the Baron de Canabrava declares: “‘The times are out of joint…Even the most intelligent people are unable to make their way through the jungle we’re living in.’”

****

CONCLUSION AND OVERVIEW

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine halted, but did not end, the major trend for rising yields in the United States Treasury marketplace which commenced in March 2020 and accelerated in early August 2021. Despite this “flight to quality” (safe haven) pause, the long run pattern for increasing UST rates eventually will resume. Substantial inflation in America and the OECD relative to recent interest rate levels as well as globally high government (and other) debt levels will propel UST rates upward. Previous essays pointed not only to rising rates for high-quality government debt outside of the United States, as in Germany. A pattern of higher yields in the United States corporate sector as well as in lower quality emerging marketplace sovereign debt appeared. Thus a long run rising yield environment is an international phenomenon.

****

Convergence and divergence (lead/lag) patterns between marketplaces can change or transform, sometimes dramatically. Marketplace history does not necessarily repeat itself, either entirely or even partly. Marketplace history nevertheless provides guidance regarding the probabilities of future relationships.

“History on Stage: Marketplace Scenes” (8/9/17) and subsequent essays updating it (such as 3/9/21’s “Truth and Consequences: Rising American Interest Rates”, “Financial Marketplaces: Convergence and Divergence Stories” (4/6/21), “American Inflation and Interest Rates: Painting Pictures” (5/4/21), and “Paradise Lost: the Departure of Low Interest Rates” (2/9/22) emphasized: “Marketplace history need not repeat itself, either entirely or even partly. Yet many times over the past century, significantly increasing United States interest rates have preceded a noteworthy peak in key stock marketplace benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S+P 500. The yield climb sometimes has occurred over a rather extended time span, and the arithmetical (basis point) change has not always been large.” The US Treasury marketplace has been an important standard for this analysis. The 10 year UST note is a key benchmark.

What about trends for the S+P 500 and other advanced nation stock battlegrounds? Quite some time prior to Russia’s 2/24/22 attack on Ukraine, rising interest rates and tumbling emerging equity marketplaces warned that the S+P 500 probably would fall significantly. “Emerging Marketplaces, Unveiling Dangers” (12/2/21) concluded that “the S+P 500 probably has established a notable top or soon will do so”. “Paradise Lost: the Departure of Low Interest Rates” (2/9/22) stated: “The S+P 500’s stellar high, 1/4/22’s 4819, probably was a major peak; if its future price surpasses that celestial height, it probably will not do so by much.” “The S+P 500 price probably will decline further and establish new lows beneath the January 2022 trough. The development of a bear trend (decline of at least 20 percent) also is probable.”

Significantly, the S+P 500’s 1/4/22 high at 4819 and its initial 12.4 percent correction to 1/24/22’s 4223 preceded Russia’s late February 2022 invasion by several weeks. Thus that attack did not initiate significant S+P 500 weakness. In addition to the rising yields (increasing inflation; as well as lofty debt levels and outlook) and feeble emerging stock marketplaces, arguably high valuations from the historic perspective for the S+P 500 also existed prior to the Russia/Ukraine war. The strong United States dollar prior to the attack also pointed to stock marketplace weakness. The US dollar remains robust. The vicious bull spike in petroleum, wheat, and many other commodities since the invasion further undermines the S+P 500 and related stock domains. Looking forward, the S+P 500 probably will continue to retreat.

As “Paradise Lost” stated, the UST 10 year note yield probably will climb to at least the 2.50 to 3.00 percent range, with a substantial likelihood of achieving a considerably higher summit. The Federal Reserve and other heroic central banking generals probably will not deploy substantial actions to rescue the S+P 500 unless it tumbles around twenty percent or more from a prior pinnacle.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Marketplace Relationships- Life During Wartime (3-7-22)