GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.


 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile





UNITED KINGDOM- GETTING POUNDED © Leo Haviland, January 10, 2012

As the fifth largest economy in the world and as a major center of international finance, the United Kingdom is not alone. It remains entwined with the long-running worldwide economic crisis. Although challenges to the British economy intertwine with those confronting the Eurozone, they do not duplicate these. England’s financial problems are not as severe as Greece’s, but they are not minor; England’s present situation and near term prospects do not look as strong as Germany’s. The British Pound will continue to depreciate over the next few months. This decline parallels that of the Euro FX. Bearish trends in the Pound, like those in the Euro currency, portend or confirm weakness in worldwide equities and commodities.

The Euro area currently is almost 16.4pc of the broad real trade-weighted dollar (“TWD”). It was 18.6pc in 2001. The Pound is a comparatively modest part of the TWD. The United Kingdom in 2012 (and 2011) is about 3.5 percent of the broad real TWD (compare 2001’s 5.6pc). Currency trading generals nevertheless closely monitor the cross rate between the US Dollar and the British Pound.

The Pound arguably has been in a major bear pattern for some time. The crucial plateau during the worldwide financial crisis period was attained 11/9/07 around 2.116. Although marketplace history is not marketplace destiny, keep in mind the popular chant, “weak US dollar equals strong US stocks, strong US dollar equals weak US stocks”. This British Pound top versus the dollar occurred about a month after the S+P 500’s major high on 10/11/07 at 1576. Important resistance for Sterling is about 1.665 (see the 4/28/11 high, adjacent in time to the S+P 500 pinnacle at 1371 on 5/2/11 and the Euro FX’s 1.494 5/4/11 summit versus the dollar). Also note around 1.700 (see the 8/5/09 level; compare the later timing of the Euro FX high at 11/25/09 at 1.514). The 10/28/11 top was about 1.615.

The Pound versus dollar cross rate settled around 1.543 at the end of last week, close to the 1.538 low of 10/6/11. The October 2011 level is beneath 1.563 (a fifty percent rally from the all-time low close on 2/26/85). The 1.500 level (about a ten percent drop from the 4/28/11 top) probably will be tested and broken. Though it is distant from today’s price, the key bottom around 1.430 (see the 5/20/10 low) eventually will be neared and perhaps challenged. Noteworthy additional Pound support is around 1.350 to 1.380. The 1/23/09 intraday low was about 1.350, the 3/9/09 close about 1.376 (Euro FX final cross rate low versus the greenback was 3/4/09 at 1.246). Recall the major low in the S+P 500 on 3/6/09 at 667. A 20pc fall from 1.665 is 1.332.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
United Kingdom- Getting Pounded (1-10-12)

MARKETPLACES AND POLICIES- MAKING CONNECTIONS © Leo Haviland, November 29, 2011

Since the current economic crisis emerged in 2007, a rough pattern has been that major movements and levels in US Treasury ten year note yields have preceded or coincided with those in the S+P 500. Thus, “in general”, plummeting UST yields have been paralleled by diving stock prices. And rising interest rates are connected to rallies in stocks. So in today’s world, gurus and guides often underline that higher and higher UST rates fit an economic recovery (health) scenario. In contrast, collapsing rates indicate looming (or actual) disaster; hence the popularity of flight to quality and safe haven commentary in regard to UST. Such relationships between the UST 10 year note and stocks (and variables allegedly bound to them) of course help forecasters to assess probabilities for and predict important debt and equity trend changes. Looking forward, this ongoing pattern may well persist.

Yet at some point, and arguably within the next several months, the present relationship between the US ten year and the S+P 500 may change. Thus rising UST yields eventually may coincide with sinking stocks. What key trading levels for the 10 year should one keep an eye out for? Such trigger point ranges will vary over time. So anyway, what guidelines for nowadays? If the US 10 year note yield floats decisively above the 2.50 percent level, and if stocks rally very little as that yield barrier is breached, that would hint the current (2007-2011) UST/S+P 500 relationship is altering.

As the global economic crisis flows on and on, many of its intertwined actions and participants (and thus marketplace relationships) may remain relatively unchanging. But they are not stagnant. Today’s marketplace voyagers should wonder if the crisis has drifted closer and closer to a new round of difficulties. Look at European yields, and place Germany on the sidelines. Focus instead on Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, and Italy. These countries show that severe economic problems (and downturns) are not always or inevitably associated with falling (or low) government interest rates.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.

Marketplaces and Policies – Making Connections (11-29-11)

US CORPORATE PROFITS- PATTERNS AND PERSPECTIVES © Leo Haviland, November 1, 2011

Recent historically high nominal United States corporate profit levels are a key factor inspiring many to buy and hold US stocks. Bullish forecasts regarding future net earnings, especially when such predictions extend out to misty medium term or murky long run time horizons, sustain and bolster this enthusiastic ownership. In turn, stock rallies sometimes boost optimism regarding potential corporate profitability and overall economic growth, for many have faith that equity marketplaces are forward-looking indicators for “The Economy”.

Has the US entered a blessed New Era of very high corporate profitability that will stretch happily out into the indefinite future? Probably not. Has America revived the wonderful time of the Goldilocks economy? Probably not. Higher nominal corporate profits and ascending nominal stock prices, when accompanied by rising nominal GDP, can assist national confidence and encourage spending in the short term. However, since the nominal levels are not the real (genuine) ones, they do not translate into an equivalent amount of real and permanent prosperity.

Yet even if very elevated corporate profitability does not continue, what may have caused a sustained notable upward shift relative to long run history in the ratio of nominal US corporate profits to nominal GDP? To some extent, it reflects corporate cost-cutting measures and other battles to improve efficiency. The easy money policies of the Federal Reserve Board (sustained low interest rates; money printing) and its allies and massive deficit spending (stimulus) perhaps play roles. But picture the context of sluggish to declining real US household income, still-damaged consumer balance sheets, high unemployment, weak housing prices, and very low consumer confidence. With that domestic (home) background, high US nominal corporate profits- and especially a more elevated nominal profit versus GDP ratio- also arguably reflects economic globalization trends and profits captured from overseas. If so, then relatively high American corporate profits do not entirely reflect (do not fully represent) actual overall US prosperity (“Our Economy”), merely that of many of its corporations.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.

US Corporate Profits- Patterns and Perspectives (11-1-11)

ON THE PERIPHERY (THE MONEY JUNGLE, PART FOUR) © Leo Haviland, June 20, 2011

According to conventional rhetoric, nations such as Greece, Portugal, and Ireland and their terrible sovereign debt problems are out there on the periphery. In troubling times, such concepts of distance in interest rate, currency, equity, and commodity marketplace discussions occasionally offer comfort to nervous observers. What’s relatively or supposedly unimportant nevertheless can become quite significant to a so-called or apparent center of things and allegedly core worldviews regarding it. This sometimes can happen rather fast.

Greece’s debt drama on the European periphery (and similar plays on other frontiers) highlights the acrobatic wordplay of marketplace performers. Debtors and creditors, as well as regulators and lawyers and even politicians, know the magic word “default” has ominous consequences. You can call a fiscal or other debt situation a disaster. Fine, you can label the mournful scene or event a debacle. You can swear it’s dismal, depressing, disheartening, and deplorable. But no matter what, try not to call it (and the related fix involving it) a “default”! Words such as “rollover”, “reprofiling”, and “restructuring” are satisfactory, as long as they do not cause the dreadful term “default” to spring permanently into the dialogue.

In marketplaces as elsewhere, raising the issue of the periphery suggests the merit of addressing what we take for granted and why. What is peripheral or marginal can become central (and vice versa), and so our faith in something or someone likewise can change or diminish. Or, our doubts can evolve or transform into belief. Let’s take a quick look at China and raise a couple of questions. After all, faith in the China growth story and its future near-inevitability remains widespread and deep.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
On the Periphery (The Money Jungle, Part Four)