GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.

 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile




MARKETPLACE FIREWORKS © Leo Haviland July 6, 2015

Statistics and stories constantly bombard marketplaces. In today’s marketplace environment, and especially when an especially enthralling news item bursts into view, many gurus and coaches scream about current or prospective crises, panics, and bubbles (overvaluation).

****

Recent debt-related troubles in Greece and Puerto Rico and the collapse in the Chinese stock battleground are not isolated or entirely unique (special) marketplace events. They are signs and symptoms of widespread and intertwined marketplace phenomena. They are examples of and interconnected with current problems and related (linked) marketplace price movements around the globe.

****

It is a truism that times change, but that does not mean that times necessarily are entirely or substantially different. Some historians may hearken back to the 2007-09 worldwide economic disaster; the United States real estate catastrophe and the demise of Lehman Brothers were not mere flare-ups. They did not stand alone. Debt, leverage, and credit problems were worldwide, even if they varied to some extent from place to place; their consequences erupted around the globe.

The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Bank of England, and China’s central bank have engaged for many years in highly accommodative monetary programs. Despite lax policies such as sustained yield repression and massive quantitative easing (money printing), international debt, leverage, and credit problems did not disappear. They persisted and have reappeared. These central bankers have provided cosmetic fixes, not permanent ones, to such difficulties. Remarkably easy money policies, aided by political deficit spending, have helped to spark and sustain worldwide GDP growth since around early 2009.

Yet that past success does not guarantee future triumphs. Is worldwide growth decelerating? Probably. Note the downward growth revisions in recent months for 2015 for the United States by the International Monetary Fund (Article IV Consultation, released 6/4/15) and the Fed (Economic Projections, 6/17/15). Indications of a Chinese slowdown preceded its recent stock tumble. There have been concerns about the property marketplace, shadow (and other) banking, and increasing debt. “China orders banks to keep lending to insolvent provincial projects” declares the front page of the Financial Times (5/16-17/15, p1). Note the continued bear marketplace trend in base metals in general. Through May 2015, China’s year-on-year electricity output was about flat, up only .2pc (National Bureau of Statistics).

****

Some issues obviously matter more to some traders (and marketplace sectors) than others. But in today’s interconnected global marketplaces, various key stock, interest rate, currency, and commodity playgrounds intertwine in diverse and often-changing fashions. Moreover, these arenas are never separate from the “real” economy. So flashy economic stories about one marketplace or nation can spark or accelerate modest and sometimes even dramatic price travels in numerous venues.

And regardless of which exciting tales currently capture substantial trading and media attention, they usually reflect and interconnect with crucial (and so-called “underlying”) economic (financial, commercial) and political phenomena. These noteworthy variables, issues, trends, and opinions regarding them not only capture the attention of many marketplace players, but also necessarily remain major factors for Wall Street price action and Main Street prosperity.

****

The debt and leverage (credit) problems in the United States and elsewhere which developed prior to yet culminated in the Goldilocks Era arguably remain unsolved, or have appeared in related forms. For example, America in general has a love affair with debt. The overall consumer debt burden has lightened somewhat since the darkest nights of the 2007-09 crisis. However, federal debt has jumped up. Thus America’s overall indebtedness remains quite significant. See the essay, “America’s Debt Culture” (4/6/15).

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Marketplace Fireworks (7-6-15)

MARKETPLACE PARTY TANTRUMS © Leo Haviland June 15, 2015

MARKETPLACE PARTIES

In action-packed Wall Street, whether in US stocks or another fascinating venue, winning money tends to attract attention. All else equal, and as a general rule, the more people in a given game there who capture and keep cash over time, the more likely it is that others will tend to join the particular party. Of course a gathering can get rather full, with “about everyone jammed into the room”. Or, for one or many reasons, the joyous event may become less fun, with the affair perhaps eventually ending, maybe even on a dismal note.
****

The S+P 500’s long and monumental bull march following the dreary final days of the global economic disaster (major low 3/6/09 at 667) may persist, but it currently looks rather tired and seems to be ending. In any case, stock investors in general have enjoyed the engaging party (rally) in US equities. Interest rate bulls in key domains such as US and German government debt have celebrated substantial tumbles in yields relative to June 2007 heights. As the Goldilocks Era danced to its end, the 10 year US Treasury note peak was 5.32 percent on 6/13/07; the German 10 year government note top also occurred that day, at 4.70pc. During the worldwide economic recovery, many fortune seeking investors (and speculators) have raced after suitable returns by gobbling up lower-quality debt instruments.
****

Competing coaches in Wall Street and Main Street assign a variety of reasons for the emergence, continuation, and ending of both general economic and specific marketplace bull and bear trends. Such wizards and their apostles advise and offer opportunities and warnings to eager audiences regarding marketplace phenomena, including important changes in central bank and fiscal policy. Guides and followers wonder and debate regarding what can spark, sustain, or alter the course of noteworthy price adventures within one or more stock, interest rate, currency, and commodity playgrounds.

Apparently dramatic price fluctuations and trend changes frequently inspire talk of volatility, spikes, mania, and panic. Colorful metaphors frequently punctuate descriptions and explanations. The Federal Reserve Board Chairman’s May and June 2013 tapering talk regarding potential reduction in quantitative easing (money printing) generated wordplay of a “taper tantrum”.

Sometimes preceding but often during or following particularly colorful displays of price patterns, marketplace and media ringleaders regale avid audiences with enthralling and excited language. Some speeches and arguments offer opinions regarding “fair (or true, real) value” (overvaluation and undervaluation; overshooting and undershooting; too high and too low, too rich/expensive or too cheap), natural (rational, reasonable, sensible) prices, and equilibrium.

Securities marketplaces in America and many other nations are of course very large and important to the so-called “real” economy, not merely the “financial” one. Assorted “investors” (buyers) own lots of stocks and interest rate instruments. Moreover, investment (especially in securities) has long been labeled as a reasonable, prudent, intelligent, logical, good, and praiseworthy practice. In general, selling of (or speculation in) securities (especially stocks) is less meritorious (and sometimes allegedly even bad); short-selling (especially of investment-grade equities) is often criticized as dangerous or bad.

Therefore, significant price declines in the S+P 500, and often in interest rate instruments (particularly in supposedly high-quality, investment grade government and corporate debt securities), generally inspires substantial dismay, including talk of “tantrums”. “Tantrum” language, when specifically applied to the stock and interest rate context, usually applies to price drops (bear trends). Bull moves in securities prices, even if they are of the same distance and duration as a bear trend, generally are not labeled as tantrums, for bull moves profit investors. Tantrums can ruin a wonderful party, right? Consequently, it pays to consider the potential regarding and to be on the lookout for the actual emergence of widespread and growing fears and talk about notable falls in securities prices.

Packs of Wall Street partygoers debate the definition, existence, causes, and cures of “overvaluation” phenomena such as “bubbles”. Recently, some players ask if the S+P 500, Chinese stocks, many key government bond playgrounds (picture those of the United States and Germany), and US home prices are bubbles (or overvalued and so on). Will a given bubble be burst or merely have some hot air taken out of it? To what extent will rising US Treasury and corporate debt rates dampen the United States (and international) recovery? Will climbing US government yields, or fears of them, pop a stock marketplace bubble?

This valuation rhetoric is particularly important when interpreted alongside rising nervousness regarding the worldwide economic recovery. After all, reduced GDP expansion may make it more challenging to generate corporate profits and therefore equity price gains.
****

Frequent conversations nowadays regarding overvaluation and worries about international growth underline the merit of focusing on a handful of corners within several entangled marketplace scenes. That review may help money hunters to assess the risks of staying in or entering a particular marketplace ballpark. This brief survey indicates information regarding or price points within particular marketplace arenas that will not only may draw greater attention to and inflame action in them, but also likely will help trigger dramatic price moves in other playing fields.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Marketplace Party Tantrums (6-15-15)

DO WHAT WE MUST: EUROZONE THEATRICS © Leo Haviland January 3, 2015

In the relatively near future, the European Central Bank probably will declare it will embark on more extensive quantitative easing (money printing) via purchasing Eurozone sovereign debt in secondary marketplaces. Assorted intertwined variables invite dramatic action. First, the ECB’s creative measures of the past several months have accomplished little. Think of negative policy interest rates. Marketplace response to the Targeted Longer Term Refinancing Operations (TLTRO) has been uninspiring. The ECB underscores its determination to significantly expand its balance sheet. Nevertheless, its current money printing scheme, which purchases asset-backed securities and covered bonds, thus far appears relatively modest to most audiences.

Moreover, the ECB’s fear of insufficient inflation (the deflation spectre) has increased in recent weeks, partly due to the continued bloody tumble in the petroleum complex. In its early December 2014 meeting, it underlined the Eurozone’s mediocre economic growth realities and prospects.

Potential for notable social unrest on the European scene exists. Unemployment remains stubbornly elevated. Difficulties, especially in Greece, but potentially elsewhere, recall the European periphery crisis. Greek political troubles erupted again, with a crucial election being held in late January 2015. Greece’s leading left-wing opposition party has a significant chance of winning that contest. That party wants to renegotiate and reduce the nation’s monstrous debt. Will it continue reforms of the economy and state administration desired by creditors? At times, though less so recently, this leftist group has displayed some hostility to the country’s remaining in the Euro FX circle.

Despite the Eurozone’s noble struggle to create adequate inflation (avoid deflation), its success on that front probably will be limited. Inflation and long term government interest rates in key nations such as Germany probably will not sustain substantial increases even if the ECB races down the path of massive money printing via buying of government debt securities. Keep in mind Japan’s history. The United States still falls short of the Federal Reserve’s inflation target despite sustained massive easing. Remember as well America’s experience after it ceased (or steadily “tapered”) quantitative easing rounds; the 10 year United States Treasury note yield declined.

In recent months, the Euro FX has weakened, both against the United States dollar and on an effective exchange rate basis. This currency relationship and bear trend will continue. Nowadays, part of the ECB’s inexorable determination to “do what we must” pursuant to its interpretation of its mandate involves a willingness to let the Euro FX slump. In any event, even if massive ECB money printing and currency feebleness manage to achieve an inflation goal (and higher interest rates), they likely will not generate enduring significant Eurozone economic growth.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Do What We Must- Eurozone Theatrics (1-3-15)

EUROZONE- BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO © Leo Haviland, January 3, 2012

The decline in the Euro FX does more than reflect Europe’s sovereign debt and banking crisis. Europe does not stand or act alone. Euro currency weakness underlines the continuing epic worldwide economic disaster that emerged in 2007. The sustained slump in the Euro FX since spring 2011 warns that the worldwide economic recovery that began around early 2009 is slowing. Some headway has been made in containing Eurozone (and other European) problems, but that progress has been insufficient and it probably will remain so for at least several more months. The Euro FX will depreciate further from current levels.

First, despite the major sovereign debt and banking problems, the Eurozone’s political and economic leadership has the political desire and (ultimately) sufficient economic power to preserve the Eurozone. This means keeping even members such as Greece within it. The problems of the so-called peripheral nations in key respects have become those of the entire fraternity. The Eurozone may rely on outside economic help from the International Monetary Fund or other countries to help pay for the repairs. However, the region as a whole will, “if push comes to shove”, resolve the thorny difficulties itself. And even if Greece did exit the Eurozone, remaining Eurozone members probably would band together to keep the Eurozone intact.

For some time, the so-called fixes may involve pushing the problem (dangers) off to a more distant future. The buying-time strategies (hoping that economic recovery eventually will enable a genuine escape) of course will have some costs. For example, picture inflation risks, slower growth, and some suffering by creditors.

The substantial role of the Euro FX in official reserves underlines the importance of the Eurozone and its Euro FX in the world economic order. Most of the world surely does not want the Euro FX to disappear entirely, or to suffer a massive depreciation (as opposed to a further small or even a modest depreciation). Thus at some point (“if really necessary”), the world outside of Europe would ultimately bail out Europe.

Consequently the declines in the Euro FX over the past several months confirm worldwide economic sluggishness (and slumps in stock marketplaces and commodities). So further falls in the Euro FX may reflect- or help lead to- even more declines in equity and commodity playgrounds. That additional Euro FX debasement may even reflect or accelerate an economic downturn (not just stagnation) in some regions, and not just European territories. Thus Euro FX currency depreciation alone will not solve the Eurozone’s (or overall European) problems.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.

Eurozone- Breaking Up Is Hard To Do (1-3-12)