GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.

 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile




SHAKIN’ ALL OVER: FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL TURMOIL©Leo Haviland April 1, 2025

The Guess Who sing in “Shakin’ All Over”: 
“That’s when I get the chills all over me
Quivers down my backbone
I got the shakes in my thigh bone
I got the shivers in my knee bone
Shakin’ all over”.

****

CONCLUSION

The United States (and global) economy probably will slow down substantially. The risk of a recession is substantial. Forces warning of American and international economic weakness are widespread. What are some of these factors? 

United States inflation benchmarks such as the Consumer Price Index have receded toward the Federal Reserve’s two percent objective, but they remain far enough above that target to preclude near term easing by the Fed in the absence of substantial economic weakness. The Fed has adopted a cautious strategy regarding further rate cuts. Moreover, this guardian may need to raise rates if inflation increases more than expected. 

The optimistic rhetoric regarding and devoted faith in the strategies of “Make America Great Again” (“MAGA”) and “America First” do not preclude substantial economic (and political) dangers resulting from the implementation of those programs. The essence (broad outlines) of President Trump’s probable tariff plans (which currently appear more extreme than most had expected he would impose), will generate inflation, damage consumer and business confidence, and (at least for the near term) hamper domestic (and worldwide) economic growth. Substantial protectionism does not necessarily create beneficial outcomes. America’s trading partners will retaliate. Everyone remembers that trade (tariff) wars encouraged the Great Depression to begin in 1929. In addition, the tax and immigration policies embraced by Trump and his allies represent noteworthy inflationary risks. 

Also, the long term and arguably even the near term US fiscal situation and its management are dangerous. American deficit spending and debt levels represent ongoing problems. These challenges preceded Trump’s inauguration on 1/20/25, but despite spirited talk of and hunts for fiscal savings, the current Administration’s schemes probably will worsen the nation’s debt situation. Massive fiscal expansionism over an extensive time span arguably at some point can begin to endanger rather than bolster economic growth, in part because the combination of substantial deficit spending and a very large government debt as a percentage of GDP tends to boost interest rates, especially longer term ones. Significant fierce debates regarding spending and the debt ceiling loom. 

America is not a developing/emerging marketplace nation. Yet as in those other countries, mammoth and growing US federal debt, especially in conjunction with fierce ongoing US political conflict and inflationary phenomena (encouraged by massive US tariffs), could produce a further noteworthy yield jump. There is a substantial chance that the UST 10 year’s October 2023 summit will be attacked over the next several months. However, if the American economy threatens to or actually enters a recession, the UST 10 year probably will assault 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent low. 

The essay “As the World Turns: Marketplace Battlefields” (1/1/25) emphasized: “Many times over the past century, significantly increasing United States interest rates have preceded a major peak, or at least a noteworthy top, in key stock marketplace benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S+P 500. The UST 10 year note’s yield increase from 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent interim low, and especially alongside the recent runup stage from 12/6/24’s 4.13pc to 12/26/24’s 4.64pc probably warns of a significant decline in the S+P 500 from 12/6/24’s 6100, especially since the Federal Reserve’s real Broad Dollar Index has rallied in recent months and is now probably “too strong”. The S+P 500 price probably will not exceed its December 2024 high by much, if at all.” 

Note the S+P 500’s 5.4 percent initial dip from 12/6/24’s elevation to 1/13/25’s 5773. The UST 10 year yield nevertheless continued its climb after 12/6/24’s 4.13pc interim low to reach 1/14/25’s 4.81pc. The S+P 500 peaked not long thereafter, on 2/19/25 at 6147. This S+P 500 pinnacle surpassed 12/6/24’s interim high by less than one percent. With 1/14/25’s 4.81 percent high, the UST 10 year note yield traveled above 4/25/24’s important top at 4.74pc and neared 10/23/23’s 5.02pc peak. The S+P 500 collapsed from 2/19/25’s pinnacle to 3/31/25’s 5489, a 10.7pc slump in merely six weeks. The S+P 500’s 3/31/25 low probably will be broken, even if Trump chooses to make his upcoming 4/2/25 Liberation Day tariff regime less burdensome in order to support stock prices. Though bullish optimism about corporate earnings for calendar years 2025 and 2026 persists, and even if the Trump Administration manages to engineer a noteworthy tax cut and reduce government spending to some extent, an eventual bear move in the S+P 500 of around 20 percent or more from February 2025’s peak will be unsurprising. History shows that most US bear stock trends do not end in less than two months. 

A substantial and persistent decline in the S+P 500 would warn of (or confirm) an economic downturn.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Shakin' All Over- Financial and Political Turmoil (4-1-25)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: MARKETPLACE BATTLEFIELDS ©Leo Haviland January 1, 2025

In “A Short History of Financial Euphoria”, John Kenneth Galbraith comments: “The euphoric episode is protected and sustained by the will of those who are involved, in order to justify the circumstances that are making them rich. And it is equally protected by the will to ignore, exorcise, or condemn those who express doubts.” (Chapter 1, “The Speculative Episode”)

“‘A Ti-tan iv Fi-nance,’ said Mr. Dooley, ‘is a man that’s got more money thin he can carry without bein’ disordherly. They’se no intoxicant in th’ wurruld, Hinnissy, like money.’” (Finley Peter Dunne’s “Mr. Dooley” commenting “On Wall Street”; spelling as in the original)

****

CONCLUSION

United States inflation benchmarks such as the Consumer Price Index have receded toward the Federal Reserve’s two percent objective. For at least the near term, the Fed’s December 2024 Economic Projections encourage faith in many marketplace players that the Fed will reduce its Federal Funds policy rate further by the end of calendar 2025. These intertwined factors, accompanied by the move in the S+P 500 to a new record high (12/6/24’s 6100), bullish optimism regarding US corporate earnings for 2025 and beyond, and hope that the incoming Trump Administration successfully will promote economic growth inspire belief that the American (and global) economy will keep expanding adequately (or at least have a “soft landing” and escape recession).

****

However, despite ongoing moderate (but still too high) inflation as well as inflationary proposals embraced by the incoming American Administration (Inauguration Day is 1/20/25), the United States (and global) economy probably eventually will slow down substantially. It may not escape a recession. Forces warning of an American and international economic slowdown are widespread. What are some of these factors?

Fed monetary policy was significantly restrictive for an extended time span until recently, and it probably will remain mildly so for at least the near term. The Federal Reserve Board recently adopted a cautious strategy regarding further rate cuts, which will tend to encourage economic sluggishness. Though American inflation is more subdued, it has not disappeared. The Fed’s two percent target has not been achieved. Shelter and services inflation remain lofty. The potential enactment of at least the essence (broad outlines) of tax, tariff, and immigration policies promoted by President-elect Trump represent noteworthy inflationary risks. Middle East unrest may spark a sustained rally in petroleum prices; that potentiality also tends to encourage the Fed to ease monetary policy gingerly.

In addition, the long term and arguably even the near term US fiscal situation and its management are dangerous. Massive fiscal expansionism over an extensive time span arguably at some point can begin to endanger rather than bolster economic growth, in part because the combination of substantial deficit spending and a very large government debt as a percentage of GDP tends to boost interest rates, especially longer term ones. Significant American deficit spending and debt levels represent ongoing problems, and upcoming debates regarding them and the debt ceiling loom. Note that despite the Fed’s easing, the UST 10 year note’s yield’s increase from 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent low, as well as from 12/6/24’s post-US national election trough at 4.13pc. America is not a developing/emerging marketplace country. Yet as in those other countries, mammoth and growing US federal debt, especially in conjunction with fierce ongoing US political conflict and other phenomena, could produce a further yield jump. With 12/26/24’s 4/64 percent high, the UST 10 year note yield has neared 4/25/24’s important top at 4.74pc, which is fairly close to 10/23/23’s 5.02pc peak. Over the next few months, there is a substantial chance that the UST 10 year’s October 2023 summit will be attacked and broken.

Many times over the past century, significantly increasing United States interest rates have preceded a major peak, or at least a noteworthy top, in key stock marketplace benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S+P 500. The UST 10 year note’s yield increase from 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent interim low, and especially alongside the recent runup stage from 12/6/24’s 4.13pc to 12/26/24’s 4.64pc probably warns of a significant decline in the S+P 500 from 12/6/24’s 6100, especially since the Federal Reserve’s real Broad Dollar Index has rallied in recent months and is now probably “too strong”. The S+P 500 price probably will not exceed its December 2024 high by much, if at all.

Though the “overall” US dollar may remain strong for a while longer due to relatively lofty US interest rates, the real Broad Dollar Index probably will begin to decline from around current levels, which have reached the major resistance barriers of autumn 2022. It eventually will retreat toward its key support at April 2020’s 113.4 elevation (recall also December 2023’s 113.8).

The increasing yield trend in the US T 10 year note since its September 2024 valley (and particularly its rise from 12/6/24’s 4.13 percent low) allied with the sharp appreciation in the US dollar since September 2024 (to what is probably a “too strong” level) have undermined emerging marketplace stock and bond prices. Price and time divergence of course can exist between the securities trend of emerging (developing) nations and those of advanced nations such as the US. However, history shows that in an intertwined global economy, sustained price trends in emerging marketplace stocks and bonds can converge with (parallel) those in the stock and bond battlegrounds of advanced nations. Therefore, this price weakness in emerging marketplace securities is a bearish sign for US stock and bond prices (including UST instruments, unless there eventually is a “flight to quality” into them) and global GDP growth.

US existing single-family home prices dipped after June 2024, a portent of economic weakness. In addition, American unemployment, though still fairly low, has climbed since April 2023. Commodities “in general” have plummeted substantially from their first quarter 2022 pinnacle, whereas the S+P 500 has ventured to new highs. This massive decline in commodities as well as its notable divergence from the bullish S+P 500 trend since the S+P 500’s major low on 10/13/22 at 3492, when interpreted alongside other bearish (recessionary) warning signs, probably point to approaching economic weakness and a fall in the S+P 500. As the cryptocurrency Bitcoin and gold prices in recent years have often made significant price turns roughly around the same time as the S+P 500, continuation of their recent erosion will be an ominous bear sign for US stocks.

Until recently, the US Treasury yield curve was inverted (short term rates above long term ones); history reveals this phenomenon often has preceded a recession. Over the longer run, if the American economy slows substantially or enters a recession, the UST 10 year probably will challenge 9/17/24’s 3.60 percent low.

****

In contrast to the S+P 500’s exuberance over the past year or so (and especially since 8/5/24’s 5116 trough), recent measures of Main Street optimism are mediocre. Arguably many people on Main Street already are living in recessionary times, partly because of the high inflation of the past few years. Some of former President Trump’s enduring political appeal (and his recent election triumph) probably derives from the divergence between Wall Street (and other elite group) prosperity and Main Street economic realities. Given consumer uneasiness, the recent trend of rising US Treasury 10 year note rates, and the narrowness of the Republican majority in the new House of Representatives, the incoming Trump regime probably has only a narrow time window during which it can enact policies which it hopes will maintain or increase economic growth.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
As the World Turns- Marketplace Battlefields (1-1-25)

US STOCKS OVER THE LONG RUN: BEAR MARKETPLACE HISTORY © Leo Haviland, August 4, 2023

“It’s déjà vu all over again!”, declared Yogi Berra, a famous baseball star.

****

OVERVIEW AND CONCLUSION

Given the great significance of the United States within the global economy, both Wall Street and Main Street spend much attention and energy focusing on the American economic scene. Benchmark American stock indices such as the S+P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average to some extent probably reflect the overall health of and potential for the American economy. 

United States stock marketplace trends and phenomena intertwine with those of other global stock arenas. Prices and trends for (and assorted other economic, political, and social variables influencing) US signpost stock indices such as the S+P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average interrelate with those of key American and global interest rate, currency, commodity, real estate, and other economic domains. History reveals that these cultural relationships can and do change, sometimes slowly, sometimes rapidly. Convergence and divergence (lead/lag) patterns between marketplaces can and do shift or transform. 

Price levels and trends for these key American equity marketplaces therefore attract and sustain widespread and domestic international attention. 

****

US interest rate, dollar, commodity, real estate, and other marketplace trends entangle with and influence American stock trends. 

“Long Run Historical Entanglement: US Interest Rate and Stock Trends” (7/6/23) concluded: “Many times over the past century, significantly increasing United States interest rates have preceded a major peak, or at least a noteworthy top, in key stock marketplace benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S+P 500. The yield climb sometimes has occurred over a rather extended time span. The arithmetical (basis point) change has not always been large. Sometimes the yield advance has extended past the time of the stock pinnacle.”

“Given the historic pattern in which UST [US Treasury; focus on the UST 10 year note] yield increases “lead” to peaks in key American stock benchmarks such as the S+P 500, do signs of a noteworthy rising yield trend exist on the interest rate front? Yes.” And “the pattern of rising UST 10 year note yields likely is leading to another peak in the S+P 500. This stock marketplace peak probably will occur relatively soon, probably within the next few weeks or months. However, even if the S+P 500 continues to climb, it probably will not exceed its January 2022 peak by much if at all.” 

The UST 10 year note yield broke through 3/2/23’s 4.09 percent interim high with 8/3/23’s 4.20 percent high. It thus is approaching 10/21/22’s 4.34 percent top, attained around the time of the S+P 500’s crucial trough on 10/13/22 at 3492. 

****

Given the importance of price trends in widely watched US equity indices such as the S+P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average, stock and other marketplace players and observers should review and assess long run bear (and bull) marketplace history for those American benchmarks. 

****

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
US Stocks Over the Long Run- Bear Marketplace History (8-4-23)

EASING COMES, EASING GOES: US GOVERNMENT INTEREST RATES © Leo Haviland, March 13, 2017

In “Uncle John’s Band”, the Grateful Dead sing: “‘Cause when life looks like easy street, there is danger at your door”.

****

OVERVIEW

Many marketplace generals nowadays have faith that rising United States government interest rates reflects both sustained adequate American economic growth and the likely development of inflation sufficient to satisfy the Federal Reserve Board’s two percent yardstick. In addition to GDP growth and rising inflation and inflation expectations, observers also should focus on other issues and their consequence for assorted marketplace trends and relationships.

Viewpoints of natural (equilibrium, fair or true value, normal, average, appropriate) prices and price overshooting or undershooting (expensive, cheap; too high, too low) reflect subjective opinions, not science. In any case, relatively few observers ask whether the Federal Reserve guardian will permit inflation benchmarks to exceed for a relatively long time (and somewhat decisively) its adored two percent signpost. Such overshooting by notable inflation variables will tend to propel government yields higher than many expect. The US Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) jumped 2.5 percent year-on-year in January 2017. Will personal consumption expenditure (PCE) inflation also overshoot the Fed’s two percent target?

The Fed likely will tolerate inflation target overshooting for some time because it wants to be confident that the achievement of its inflation goal will be durable. Such an indulgent policy regarding overshooting still permits the Fed to engage in gradual increases in policy rates (Federal Funds), especially as asset prices (such as American stocks and real estate) have soared since their dismal global economic crisis lows and as the prospective US fiscal outlook appears rather expansionary (and even overly stimulative).

Also, trust in the ability of the Fed and its allies such as the European Central Bank to manage inflation is widespread. How many audiences worry whether the years of devoted yield repression have created a reservoir of pent-up inflation, which the Fed’s gradual rollback of accommodation (permitting higher Federal Funds and government rates) will unveil and reflect?

America has a substantial public debt. Not much attention focuses on the likelihood and implications of growing American federal budget deficits, even without any legislative changes, over the next decade and beyond. See the US Congressional Budget Office’s “The Budget and Economic Outlook; 2017 to 2027” (1/24/17), as well as “Federal Debt and the Statutory Limit” (3/7/17). According to the NY Times (3/10/17, pA21), on 3/13/17 the CBO is expected to release its judgment on the proposed House Republican legislation, the American Health Care Act, aiming to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).

Moreover, the media, politicians, and Wall Street have spent much attention on President’s Trump’s potential tax “reform” and express hope regarding his misty infrastructure plans. But not many pundits stress that Trump’s tax scheme (even without reference to Obamacare), if enacted, likely will cause massive rises in budget deficits. The Fed may elect to raise rates more quickly (aggressively) than some predict if Congress adopts much or all of the fiscal scheme of Trump and his comrades. In any case, most people do not ask how enthusiastic foreigners (who own a huge slice of Treasury debt) will be to keep financing growing budget shortfalls. The Fed sheriff, unlike the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan, is no longer wedded to quantitative easing (securities purchasing tied into money printing), so it will not rush to add many UST obligations to its balance sheet.

Also, all else equal, substantial questions regarding national leadership quality can undermine both political and economic confidence in that nation. This situation can encourage higher interest rates, a weaker currency, or both. Donald Trump lacks government insider experience. Domestic and international faith in his political leadership ability (and in the US Congress as a whole) is not high. In the film “Easy Rider” (director Dennis Hopper) a character underlines that “it’s real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace.”

Fierce, widespread, and substantial ongoing partisan political (economic) divisions likewise risk weakening America’s currency and promoting increased government interest rates. Trump’s victory did not unite an already significantly divided America. In America, there are liberals (progressives) and conservatives (traditionalists). Populists (both left and right wing) confront the establishment (elites). Globalists contend with nationalists.

Trump’s “Make America Great Again!” and “America First” slogans and many of his policy pronouncements obviously appeal to large numbers of Americans. However, they do not attract or inspire many (and arguably a majority of) citizens. Though both the House and Senate are Republican-controlled, not all Republicans warmly support Trump and his policies. Although Trump triumphed in the Electoral College, he decisively lost the popular vote tally. The popular vote outcome obviously reflects America’s sharp political divisions. Also, the Russian President “directed a vast cyberattack aimed at denying Hillary Clinton the presidency and installing Donald J. Trump in the Oval Office, the nation’s top intelligence agencies said in an extraordinary report” (NYTimes, 1/7/17, ppA1, 11). Trump’s popular vote defeat and the report on Russian political interference undermine Trump’s political “legitimacy” (faith in it) and thus his ability to lead effectively.

America has other substantial splits and fractures. It has rich versus poor, haves versus have-nots. Look at the nation’s substantial economic inequality. Consider divisions relating to race (ethnicity), gender, religion, age, geographic region, and urban/rural. Fiery quarrels rage over tax and spending policies and priorities, health care (Obamacare), trade policies, the appropriate degree of economic regulation, abortion rights, gun ownership, and environmental issues such as climate change.

With such ongoing, wide-ranging, and seemingly intractable American divisions and related passionate debates and accusations, worries increase regarding “how anything (good; productive; necessary) can get done”. Escalating doubts relating to leadership and concerns regarding the consequences of persistent divisiveness can encourage growing fears at home and abroad regarding the nation’s current and potential political and economic outlook. This horizon consequently may not necessarily encourage a “flight to quality” by buyers into the government debt securities of that country. Instead, particularly when inflation also is increasing and budget deficits likely will rise, low (deteriorating) confidence can spur interest rate rises.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Easing Comes, Easing Goes- US Government Interest Rates (3-13-17)