GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.

 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile




HUNTING FOR YIELD: THE THRILL IS GONE © Leo Haviland October 4, 2022

BB King complains “The thrill is gone” in his song named after that lyric.

****

OVERVIEW AND CONCLUSION

 

Financial warriors in securities and other marketplaces always hunt for adequate yield (sufficient return) on their capital. Especially in Wall Street’s stock and interest rate realms, the majority of institutions and individuals (not the market-makers) eagerly searching for yield are owners, thus initiating their positions from the buying side. Most of these owners on Wall Street and Main Street seeking wealth and economic security grant themselves or receive the honored cultural designation of “investor”, with their long positions generally labeled as investments. Especially in stock and debt arenas, “investment” is deemed “good”. On Main Street, homeowners likewise as a rule view their property as an investment. And since the appealing investment badge and related rhetoric excites interest and encourages action, such as buying and holding, Wall Street guides and their media and political comrades enthusiastically and liberally employ investment wordplay, especially in stock and interest rate territories. Given the persuasiveness of investment talk, many Wall Street wizards often extend the label to other asset classes such as commodities “in general”, perhaps calling them “alternative investments”.

Of course therefore on Wall Street, investors generally are happy (joyous, pleased) when asset prices rise (especially in stocks) on a sustained basis, and sad (depressed, unhappy, angry) when such prices decline. Thus for stocks, high and rising prices (and bull market trends) are “good”, whereas low and falling prices (and bear markets) are “bad”. However, investment rhetoric and devotion to ownership do not abolish price risk. So capital preservation matters too. Because broad, longer-run directional price patterns are not necessarily a one-way street, numerous investors during a noteworthy price decline fearfully run for cover, selling some or all of their positions (or at least not buying more for their portfolio, even an allegedly well-diversified one).

Moreover, increasing fears regarding whether economic growth will be adequate can make investors (and others) considerably more nervous about holding on to a given quantity of assets. Uncertainty itself (as well as price “volatility”), if sufficiently substantial, can help to inspire many to flee out of assets which now appear to be “too risky”!

****

In any case, the bear marketplace trend in the S+P 500 which commenced in January 2022 (and related slumps in other advanced nation equity arenas) and significantly rising yields (falling prices) in the US Treasury marketplace (as well as in other sovereign and corporate debt landscapes around the globe) thus have disturbed, dismayed, and injured many investors (and other owners). That stocks and bonds have collapsed “together” in recent months is especially upsetting! Note also the long-running retreat in emerging marketplace stocks. Commodities “in general” have cratered from their first quarter 2022 highs. In recent months, even United States home prices have declined moderately. This scary financial carnage surely has substantially reduced financial net worth around the world, and especially within the consumer (household) sector. The US dollar, which is part of this capital destruction story, not only has remained very strong for quite some time, but also recently climbed to new highs.

In today’s international and intertwined economy, the interrelated substantial price falls in the stock and bond marketplaces, and the potential for even greater weakness than has thus far appeared in home prices, plus a “too strong” US dollar, are a recipe for recession. The net worth destruction resulting from substantial price falls in these assets probably indicates a significantly greater probability of recession, not merely an extended period of mediocre real GDP growth (or stagflation), in America and many other leading economies, than most forecasters assert. Although commodities are not a substantial part of household net worth, their significant price slump in recent months not only confirms the price downturn in the S+P 500 and related stock marketplaces, but also warns of underlying economic feebleness. Note recent year-on-year declines in US petroleum consumption.

****

 

“Marketplace Expectations and Outcomes” (9/5/22) restated the viewpoint of “Summertime Blues, Marketplace Views” (8/6/22): “Despite growing concerns about a United States (and global) economic slowdown or slump, and despite potential for occasional “flights to quality” into supposed safe havens such as the United States Treasury 10 year note and the German Bund, the long run major trend for higher UST and other benchmark international government yields probably remains intact.” Regarding the S+P 500, the essays concluded: “Although the current rally in the S+P 500 may persist for a while longer, the downtrend which commenced in January 2022 probably will resume. The S+P 500’s June 2022 low probably will be challenged.”

****

Marketplace history is not marketplace destiny, and convergence and divergence patterns between stocks, interest rates, and other arenas can shift, sometimes dramatically. However, despite the S+P 500’s ferocious rally after 9/30/22’s 3584 trough, it and other related stock marketplaces probably will fall beneath their recent lows eventually. The US Treasury 10 year note yield, given ongoing lofty inflation levels around the globe and the determined effort of the Federal Reserve and other central bankers to reduce inflation to acceptable heights, probably over time will climb higher, exceeding its recent high around four percent. Consumer price inflation probably will remain lofty for at least a few more months on a year-on-year basis. However, within that rising yield trend, UST prices occasionally may rally due to nervous “flights to quality”.

A victorious fight against the evil of excessive inflation probably requires a recession. If a notable global recession emerges (or if fears regarding the development of one grow substantially), then central bankers probably will slow or even halt their current rate-raising program.

Suppose OPEC and its allies engineer a notable rally in petroleum prices from current levels which lasts for a while, or that the Russia/Ukraine war induces a renewed rally in energy (and perhaps other) commodity prices. Such ascents in commodities prices (if they indeed occur) will help to keep consumer prices high and thereby tend to induce central banks to sustain their current policy tightening (interest rate boosting) programs.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Hunting for Yield- the Thrill is Gone (10-4-22)

THE FEAR FACTOR: FINANCIAL BATTLEFIELDS © Leo Haviland January 5, 2021

“But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions such as they have in Japan over the past decade?” Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the United States Federal Reserve Board, Speech to the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, “The Challenge of Central Banking in a Democratic Society” (12/5/96)

Voltaire’s 18th century novel, “Candide, or Optimism”, depicts a character who believes that all is for the best in the allegedly best of all possible worlds.

****

OVERVIEW AND CONCLUSION

In recent times, prices in the S+P 500 and other benchmark United States and global stock indices, lower-grade interest rate instruments within corporate fields (and low-quality foreign dollar-denominated sovereign debt), and commodities “in general” often have risen (or fallen) at roughly the same time. They generally have climbed in significant bull ascents (and fallen in noteworthy bear retreats) “together”. These entangled domains therefore have alternatively reflected joyous bullish enthusiasm as “investors” and other traders avidly hunted for adequate return (“yield”), and terrifying bearish scenes as they raced fearfully for safety. Whether the existing bull trend for American stocks in general (use the S+P 500 as a benchmark) persists is especially important for realms connected with the S+P 500.

Actions by and rhetoric from the Federal Reserve Board and its central banking allies around the globe since the calamitous price crashes during first quarter 2020 restored investor (buying) confidence and generated price rallies in the S+P 500 and related marketplace playgrounds. In response to the economic (and political) challenges of the ravaging coronavirus era, gargantuan deficit spending by the United States and its foreign comrades also assisted these bullish price moves. Based on this as well as past experience (especially in regard to the merciful Fed), marketplace captains and their troops dealing in the S+P 500 and intertwined provinces once again have great faith that these marketplaces will not fall “too far”, or for “very long”. Bullish financial media fight especially hard to promote, justify, and sustain stock marketplace investment and price rallies in particular. In regard to equities in particular, propaganda speaking of “buy and hold for the long run” and “buy the dip” inspired entrenched investors and often sparked new buying. Thus, and despite occasional worries, significant complacency gradually has developed over the past several months in assorted stock marketplaces and “asset classes” tied to them.

Complacency regarding US Treasury yield trends has bolstered the relative calm and bullish optimism in the S+P 500. Strenuous yield repression (and money printing/quantitative easing) by the Federal Reserve Board and its central bank teammates not only assisted the S+P 500 rally, but also boosted belief that US Treasury yields will not shift much higher (and definitely will not rise “too high”) over the next couple of years.

Moreover, (for many months) easygoing stock bulls have had happy visions of recovering corporate earnings for calendar 2021 and rather robust ones thereafter. Numerous S+P 500 bull advocates do not worry much about or downplay risks of historically “high” valuations. “This time is different”, right? Most of these sunny forecasters generally see possibilities for further significant economic stimulus plans (deficit spending) during the upcoming Biden Administration. Encouraged by the development of coronavirus vaccines, they are optimistic regarding the eventual emergence of a V-shaped recovery, or at least an adequate one.

****

This relative complacency through end-year 2020 in the S+P 500 and many other Wall Street marketplace territories (as the upward price trends evidence) contrasts with the ongoing economic agitation in the wider (“real”; Main Street) arena. Picture, for example, issues of economic inequality and the sharp divide between the “haves” and “have-nots”. Also, underline in America and elsewhere assorted and widespread political splits and heated wordplay. This rhetoric is not merely in regard to establishment/elites versus an array of left (liberal; progressive; keep in mind accusatory weapons such as the labels “socialist”, “communist”, and “Marxist”) and right wing (conservative; reactionary) populist (or “radical” or “fringe”) movements. In the United States, concepts of “identity politics” link to cultural wars involving assorted factors such as race/ethnicity, sex/gender/sexuality, age, religion, and geographic region/urban/suburban/rural. Diverse patriots brawl over the relative merits of nationalism and globalization, capitalism and socialism, and so forth. Though in stock and other fields bulls and bears always battle to some extent, the relative peace and tranquility in many Wall Street marketplaces contrasts with the turmoil and hostility permeating the wider cultural vista.

The dangers of weaker than forecast corporate earnings and lofty valuations for American stocks “in general” probably are significantly greater than the “consensus” wisdom promulgated by stock marketplace bulls. Figuratively speaking, US stock prices around current levels probably have “built in” a substantial amount of predicted earnings growth for calendar 2021 and 2022. Many corporations and small businesses remain under pressure. Year-end 2020 buying of stocks to have further equities on the books by definition is finished. The relatively slow implementation of the coronavirus vaccine is one consideration weighing on the recovery, corporate earnings, and valuation. It likely will take at least several months to vaccinate a substantial share of the global population, including within the United States and other advance nations. Besides, the coronavirus problem is bad and may be worsening. So its burden on economic output and employment levels probably will continue for the next several months

Moreover, despite the complacency regarding United States Treasury yield levels and trends, using the UST 10 year note as a signpost, UST yields probably have commenced a long run increase. Despite widespread global desires for a sufficiently feeble home currency to promote economic recovery and growth, and the related willingness to engage in competitive depreciation to accomplish this, spring 2020 unveiled the onset of substantial US dollar weakness. Although the US dollar (using the Fed’s “Broad Dollar Index” as the yardstick) has withered about ten percent from its peak, its long run pattern probably will remain down.

As “Games People Play: Financial Arenas” (12/1/20) emphasized, these interest rate and currency considerations also warn of a notable decline in the S+P 500. The probable eventual notable climb in US interest rate yields likely will connect with a weaker US dollar. The Fed and the incoming Democratic Administration (and debtors in general) probably want higher American inflation (including higher wages). Massive and rising US (and global) government debt is an important warning sign in this context. American household debt is huge in arithmetic terms, and this will put pressure on much of the nation if the economic recovery is not robust.

Marketplaces, marketplace relationships, and the relative importance (and interrelations) of their variables obviously can and do change over time. However, cultural history can influence “current” marketplace perceptions and decisions, especially when cultural (economic, political, social) conditions are at least significantly similar. Though numerous phenomena were involved in the stock marketplace crashes of 1929 and 2007-09, both occurred in an era of significant debt and leverage. That debt and leverage situation arguably fits the global situation nowadays as well.

****

Significant fear likely soon will return to the S+P 500, other stock signposts (including those in emerging marketplaces), US corporate bonds, lower-grade foreign dollar-denominated sovereign debt, and many commodities.

What’s the bottom line for the S+P 500’s future trend? Although it is a difficult call, the S+P 500 probably will start a significant correction, and perhaps even a bear trend, in the near future. A five percent move in the S+P 500 over 3588, the important 9/2/20 interim high at 3588, gives 3767, and it probably will be difficult to breach that level by much on a sustained basis. The S+P 500’s high to date, 1/4/21’s 3770, exceeded the 9/2/20 top by 5.1 percent.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
The Fear Factor- Financial Battlefields (1-5-21)

US STOCKS: SHADOWS AND SIGNALS © Leo Haviland February 3, 2014

Yet during the darkest days of the worldwide economic crisis of late 2008/early 2009 as well as during the subsequent recovery, Federal Reserve Board easy money policies have played key roles in encouraging bull moves in the S+P 500 (and many other equity playgrounds). Likewise, the elimination of some of these schemes, particularly previous rounds of quantitative easing (money printing), has occurred alongside highs in American stock benchmarks.

What does tapering foreshadow? The Fed’s recent decision to reduce (taper) and eventually eliminate the current gigantic round of money printing warns that a notable top is or relatively soon will be in place. Thus the mid-January 2014 high point in the S+P 500 arguably represents an important top. If a stock marketplace peak is not currently in place, one probably will be by around the end of first quarter 2014. Several other indicators likewise portend a plateau in the S+P 500. Fed tapering, to the extent it coincides with at least a modest decline in the S+P 500 and related indices, will hint that economic growth in America, other advanced nations, and developing and emerging countries will be less than predicted by guardians such as the International Monetary Fund.
Chart--S+P-500-(2-3-14,-for-essay-US-Stocks--Shadows-and-Signals)

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
US Stocks- Shadows and Signals (2-3-14)
Chart- S+P 500 (2-3-14, for essay US Stocks- Shadows and Signals)