GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS

Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.

Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.

Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.


 

Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.

RSS View Leo Haviland's LinkedIn profile View Leo Haviland’s profile





TALKING THE TALK: MARKETPLACE PARALLELS © Leo Haviland October 19, 2014

Marketplace history of course does not necessarily repeat itself, either in whole or in part. However, sometimes it does. In any case, it should not be forgotten. Storytellers reveal (construct, create) parallels (and differences) between the marketplace past and present, not only to explain ancient times and the current situation, but also to predict future phenomena.

Coincidentally, the S+P 500’s recent high at 2019 on 9/19/14 occurred almost exactly on the sixth anniversary of Lehman Brothers’ 9/15/08 bankruptcy filing. Around the time of that autumn 2008 event, the fearsome worldwide economic crisis that emerged in mid-2007 accelerated.

Yet not so coincidentally, many recent intertwined dramatic marketplace moves in interest rate, stock, currency, and commodity arenas bear significant resemblance to those of the 2007-09 theater. Why? Problems now echo those of the prior period. Some troubles represented by that supposedly distant past have not been sufficiently fixed. In addition, some excesses of that long ago time, even if in somewhat different ways, have reappeared.

In regard to the current vista, underline several trend interrelations between key playgrounds. Focus on the time dimension in this context. Note not only the US Treasury 10 year note’s yield decline since its 1/2/14 top at 3.05pc (and the narrowing of the 10 year less two year UST spread), but also the UST’s yield slump from 9/19/14’s 2.65pc and its break under key support around 2.40 percent. The S+P 500 fell nearly ten percent following 9/19/14’s 2019 plateau. In addition, the recent peak in emerging marketplace stocks (“MXEF”; MSCI Emerging Stock Markets Index, from Morgan Stanley) on 9/4/14 at 1104 occurred close in time to both the S+P 500’s recent high as well as the rally in the broad real trade-weighted US dollar. Moreover, recall the sharp retreat in the broad Goldman Sachs Commodity Index since 6/23/14’s 673 interim top, particularly its recent decisive break under important support at 595/612.

The current and future marketplace theater probably will not duplicate the scope of the 2007-09 global economic disaster. Nevertheless, despite the passage of several years, significant deficit spending by America and other key nations, and widespread extraordinary central bank easy money policies (conjure up the Federal Reserve’s yield repression and money printing schemes), we have not entirely escaped the horrific days of the 2007-09 era.

The major bull move from the S+P 500’s 10/10/02 bottom at around 769 to 2007’s lofty 10/11/07 major high at 1576 lasted five years. The October 2002 bottom times two is 1538, or within about three percent the October 2007 peak. Since the S+P 500 achieved its major bottom on 3/6/09 at 667, its bull move has run about five and a half years, even longer than 2002-07’s advance. Whereas S+P 500 prices doubled over the 2002-07 span, 9/19/14’s height at 2019 triples March 2009’s major bottom (doubles 7/1/10’s 1011 trough; and jumps about 50 percent over 11/16/12’s 1343 low).

Given that the S+P 500’s major bull move since March 2009 was even longer-lasting and stratospheric than the preceding one, observers should be watchful for a very noteworthy S+P 500 decline, extending (or greater than) the one that so far since 9/19/14 has reached around ten percent. With parallels between the 2007-09 world and the current environment in mind (given the recent moves in the UST 10 year, emerging marketplace stocks, the broad real trade-weighted dollar, and the broad GSCI), the S+P 500’s 9/19/14 height probably represents an important top. If that top is broken, it probably will not be exceeded by much.

Incidentally, for those seeking further timing parallels in the S+P 500, the 9/19/14 date is not far from the October 2002 and 2007 calendar tops and bottoms (10/10/02; 10/11/07), but also 10/4/11’s important low at 1075.

Looking forward, since history need not repeat itself, the Fed’s eloquence and actions may not always achieve the goals the Fed diligently seeks. Continued or even increased easing, whether by the Fed or other important central banks, do not inevitably produce rallies in the S+P 500 (or a continued economic recovery).

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Talking the Talk- Marketplace Parallels (10-19-14) (1)
Charts- Ten Yr UST, S+P 500, GSCI, Corp Bond (10-19-14, for essay Talking the Talk- Marketplace Parallels)

WALKING THE WALK: US STOCKS AND THE DOLLAR © Leo Haviland October 5, 2014

The recent advance in America’s broad real trade-weighted dollar index has attacked June 2012’s 86.3 high (Federal Reserve Board, H.10; March 1973=100, monthly average). That key top rests near August 2008’s 86.7, a level from which the dollar rallied sharply during the worldwide economic disaster that emerged in mid-2007 and accelerated during 2008. The broad real trade-weighted dollar (“TWD”) probably will climb higher (even if only modestly) over the next several months given the current trends in the US Treasury 10 year note, emerging stock marketplaces, and commodities in general. For these present-day marketplaces and their interrelations, keep in mind their 2007-2009 history. Moreover, the current level and probable near term climb in the TWD, when viewed in conjunction with trends in the UST 10 year and emerging stocks and commodities, indicate that a significant plateau in the S+P 500 is or soon will be in place. A walk in the TWD toward or above September 2008’s 88.8 (and especially) October 2008’s 93.9 increases the likelihood of a noteworthy S+P 500 peak.

After the Fed ceased its prior rounds of money printing, the 10 year UST note yield and the S+P 500 tumbled. Although that benevolent central bank embarked on a slow tapering process in mid-December 2013, America’s 10 year government note yields have meandered downhill from 1/2/04’s 3.05 percent top. Shouldn’t US longer term government interest rates tend to rise if significant real GDP growth or widespread hopes for it exist? In an interdependent international economy, the ongoing sideways to down trend in emerging marketplace stocks in general warns of slowing growth in advanced as well as developing nations. The retreat in the overall commodities complex roughly resembles that of emerging marketplace equities.

Are owners of US stocks complacent? Not only do many players in stocks and elsewhere have faith in the Fed. Over the past year and a half, the S+P 500’s percentage declines have been even smaller and of increasingly short duration. This probably has mitigated marketplace fears of a large stock retreat.

Measurement moves hint that the S+P 500 probably does not have much more room to travel upward for the near term relative to 9/19/14’s recent high at 2019. The 3/6/09 major low around 667*3 equals about 2000. The 7/1/10 low at 1011 times two is 2022. The key take-off point of 1343 on 11/16/12 (various renewed easing by the ECB, Fed, and Bank of Japan within several months before or after that date) times 1.5 is 2015. All these levels are around the recent high. Also, within the context of the current long run bull move in the S+P 500, October is an important anniversary month. Recall 10/11/07’s major peak 1576 and the significant 10/4/11 bottom at 1075.

Charts--S+P-500-and-emerging-stock-marketplace-index-(10-5-14,-for-essay-Walking-the-Walk--US-Stocks-and-the-Dollar)-2

Charts--S+P-500-and-emerging-stock-marketplace-index-(10-5-14,-for-essay-Walking-the-Walk--US-Stocks-and-the-Dollar)-1

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Walking the Walk- US Stocks and the Dollar (10-5-14)
Charts- S+P 500 and emerging stock marketplace index (10-5-14, for essay Walking the Walk- US Stocks and the Dollar)

STEPPING HIGHER: UST TWO YEAR NOTE YIELDS © Leo Haviland September 21, 2014

The US Treasury two year and 10 year notes over the past several years have made many important marketplace turns around the same time. The yield spread relationship between those instruments provides insight into and offers guidance regarding Federal Reserve policies. Although other variables of course are relevant, this spread offers indications regarding the extent of American (and international) economic strength or weakness.

Important trend moves in the 10 year less two year United States government yield spread often have roughly coincided with significant Federal Reserve Board policy decisions (sometimes assisted by major ones by the European Central Bank and others). Especially since around the time of its mid-December 2008 low around 125 basis points (10 year yield higher than two year; a positive yield curve), and thus during the Fed’s yield repression and quantitative easing era, the 10 year less two year spread has tended to widen (become more positive) during times of US economic growth (or notable signs or hopes for it) and decline during times where economic expansion slows or slumps (or when fears rise that this will occur). Fed quantitative easing moves link up with a widening of the yield spread (particularly via boosting the 10 year UST yield). The ending of the Fed’s money printing ventures have tied to narrowing of the yield spread (especially via falls in the UST 10 year yield). A narrowing pattern in this spread and the UST 10 year itself after the ending of QE (including the current tapering round) suggests that noteworthy “underlying” weakness remains in the US economy. See “Bond Yield Perspectives: Easing Comes: Easing Goes” (9/1/14) and related essays.

However, since the UST 10 year’s 1/9/14 plateau at 3.05pc, its yields on balance have moved sideways to down, whereas the two year yield pattern seems sideways to up over that period. The slip in the 10 year yield since then, given the Fed’s determination to increase inflation, indicates less than robust US (worldwide) economic growth. The increase in two year yields may reflect Fed plans more than notable overall economic strength (or the Fed’s faith that such strength is or will soon emerge). Yet will yields for both UST notes keep moving higher since their mid-August 2014 lows?

From the depths of the international economic disaster through most of the succeeding years, these US Treasury yield curve ventures (trend changes) generally have occurred around the same time as significant moves not only in the US Treasury 10 year note but also in the US stock marketplace (S+P 500). Many lows in the 10/2 UST yield curve spread have tied up with (occurred within a few months of) important S+P 500 bottoms; pinnacles in the spread likewise connect somewhat closely in time with plateaus in the US stock landscape.

However, whereas the 10 less two year spread and the 10 year yield itself have declined in recent months (265 basis point high in the yield spread 12/31/13; 3.05pc high on 1/2/14 for the UST 10 year), the S+P 500 this year has ascended to new highs over 2000. Thus the S+P 500’s relationship relative to the 10 less two year spread and the UST 10 year itself seems to have diverged from its prior pattern.

Significantly, the rise in two year note yields since very late 2013/early 2014 contrasts with the fall in the UST 10 year yield and the narrowing of the 10 less two year spread. Since end December 2008, roughly simultaneous declines in the 10 year note yield and the 10 less two year UST spread have been associated with a relatively weak US economic situation (or fears that such feebleness will emerge; international players such as the Eurozone affect this picture).

This slide in the 10 year note and the 10 less two year UST spread connects with the end of Federal Reserve money printing festivals, including the current one. Thus the US may be economically weaker (or more vulnerable to such feebleness) than many marketplace players or even the Fed (judging from its Fed Funds projections) perceives.

Emerging stock marketplaces have not followed the S+P 500 up to record highs. Given the slowing of economic growth in those economies, this represents a warning that the massive bull move in the S+P 500 may not continue forever. Look at the “MSCI Emerging Stock Markets Index” (from Morgan Stanley: MXEF). The MXEF over the past year or so has advanced from lows near in time to those in the S+P 500. Note the MXEF troughs at 878 on 6/25/13, 905 on 8/28/13, and 914 on 2/4/14. However, the MXEF remains below its Goldilocks Era pinnacle at 1345 (11/1/07), as well as 4/27/11’s 1212 plateau. In addition, it has started to fade from its recent top at 1104 on 9/4/14 (despite the ECB’s monetary easing action). If the MXEF starts to step significantly lower (keep an eye on 2/29/12’s high at 1085 and 1/3/13’s one at 1083), that will suggest increasing risks for the S+P 500 (especially if the UST 10 year yield also is unable to breach the 3.05pc level). Renewed weakness in emerging stock marketplaces increases the odds that the continued S+P rally will end (S+P 500 divergence from UST 10 year and 10 less two year trends will cease).

The S+P 500 eventually dropped after QE1 and QE2 ended. Since the current round of US quantitative easing will end in October 2014 (tapering of purchases will finally finish), one should be especially watchful for a reversal (even if it is modest) of the S+P 500’s epic bull trend.

Another sign of sluggish economic growth, particularly in emerging marketplaces, has been the decline in commodities “in general” since spring 2011 (broad Goldman Sachs Commodity Index/GSCI). The GSCI peaked at 762 on 4/11 and 5/2/11. Since then, it generally has displayed a pattern of declining (lower and lower) highs. It recently made an interim top around 673 on 6/23/14, slipping to 582 on 9/15/14.

Charts--Two-Year-UST,-10-Year-v-2-Year-UST-spread-(9-21-14,-for-essay-Stepping-Higher--UST-Two-Year-Note-Yields)-2

Charts--Two-Year-UST,-10-Year-v-2-Year-UST-spread-(9-21-14,-for-essay-Stepping-Higher--UST-Two-Year-Note-Yields)-1

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Stepping Higher- US Two Year Note Yields (9-21-14)
Charts- Two Year UST, 10 Year v 2 Year UST spread (9-21-14, for essay Stepping Higher- UST Two Year Note Yields)

BOND YIELD PERSPECTIVES: EASING COMES, EASING GOES © Leo Haviland September 1, 2014

The dreadful economic crisis which emerged throughout the interconnected global economy after the departure of the Goldilocks Era in mid-2007 saw its darkest times in late 2008/early 2009. Politicians and central bankers around the globe took decisive action to escape and repair the disaster and to spark and sustain recovery. From late 2008/early 2009 through the ensuing years, dramatic United States Federal Reserve policy action, and especially massive quantitative easing (money printing), often has been associated with rising interest rates in the ten year US Treasury note. The ending of quantitative easing has connected with declines in the 10 year UST yield.

In the American theater, the past several years indicate that rising UST 10 year yields tie in with the reality of (or hopes for) at least a moderate economic recovery. Slumping UST rates are bound to the existence of (or fears about) more feeble US (and international) growth (or even worries that a downturn may occur). History of course need not repeat itself, and viewpoints change. Nevertheless, and despite America’s strong 2Q14 GDP expansion, the decline in UST 10 year yields over the course of the Fed’s current slow tapering program suggests that US and worldwide economic growth probably is and will remain mediocre.

The European Central Bank probably will embark on a modest money printing adventure in the relatively near future. However, all else equal, that decision likely will boost- but not substantially- the key German sovereign 10 year note yield (and 10 year government note yields in America and many other key nations).
Read the rest of this entry »

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this article as a PDF file.
Bond Yield Perspectives- Easing Comes, Easing Goes (9-1-14)
Charts- Ten Year Notes (9-1-14, for essay Bond Yield Perspectives- Easing Comes, Easing Goes)